Friday, January 24, 2014

Glenn Beck's Inconsistant Hypocrisy

Glenn Beck Quote ... "It’s time we all realized we’re going to disagree on a lot, but if we don’t try and tell each another how to live our lives, we can get along".

What the crap does that mean?? Who's trying tell anyone how to live their lives? That whole comment is about Glenn's support for homosexuality, and same-sex marriage. It's the militant homosexuals that are tying to tell people how to live. ... And what and how to believe.
12 chilling incidents of LGBT tyranny
http://www.wnd.com/.../12-chilling-incidents-of-lgbt.../

The militant homosexual activists are using the force of gov to coerce others into validating and affirming their private sexual behavior. And PLEASE! None of this crapoloa of homosexuality being the same as race. I almost barfed watching Glenn comparing the southern race videos to the guy lecturing about engaging in homosexuality. Come'on Glenn!! You've drunk the koolaid of the radical LGBTQ movement that equates race with a sexual behavior. That's soooo fallacious!! Have there ever been any former people of color? NO!! Of course not! But there are multitudes of former homosexuals. Demolishing the idea that 'there's no such thing as an ex gay'
http://treesforlunch.blogspot.com/2011/12/demolishing-idea-that-theres-no-such.htmlhttp://treesforlunch.blogspot.com/2011/12/demolishing-idea-that-theres-no-such.html

Glenn talks all around it to keep from actually saying that a sexual behavior equates to race, but that's the propaganda he now believes. The LGBTQ's best emotional quote is "why would anyone CHOOSE to be gay?" Because we are all born and predisposed towards all manner of desires, compulsions, weaknesses and behaviors that are harmful and unhealthy. Just because someone is born predisposed to gluttony does not mean we should embrace and endorse obesity. It's medically harmful. Just as homosexuality is medically harmful to those who engage in it, and is at a greater risk of infectious disease. http://gayterribletruth.wordpress.com/category/medical/http://gayterribletruth.wordpress.com/category/medical/

Glenn researches the Progressive movement from it's beginning, but will not look at who stated the LGBTQ movement, and the perversions they espoused. Father of ‘Gay Rights’ Dies; Media Ignore NAMBLA Connection http://bit.ly/1cddArc ... ‘Gay Rights’ Icon Frank Kameny Spoke at NAMBLA Meeting in 198 http://bit.ly/1gb3cUnhttp://bit.ly/1gb3cUn

No, no, no ... Glenn must'n look to hard at the founding of the homosexual movement, he might find something that would rock his preconceived and indoctrinated views on the issue. He totally ignores Jefferson and Washington's stance on homosexual behavior. He totally ignores natural law that the founders relied on. So what does Glenn really believe concerning our founding heritage? I get so disgusted at his inconsistency.

I'm a live and let live kind of person, but when a militant organization like the LGBTQ activists start using gov to enforce their demands of validation and affirmation ... that I will have NONE of. And Glenn should stand for the right of conscience every time over a sexual behavior.

Glenn says gov is telling homosexuals they can't get married. That's not true. Gay couples can already do everything married people do--express love, set up housekeeping, share home ownership, have sex, raise children, commingle property, receive inheritance, and spend the rest of their lives together. It’s not criminal to do any of these things.

Homosexuals can even have a wedding. Yes, it's done all the time. Entire cottage industries have sprung up from Hollywood to the Big Apple serving the needs--from wedding cakes to honeymoons--of same-sex lovers looking to tie the knot.

Denying marriage doesn't restrict anyone. It merely withholds social approval from a lifestyle and set of behaviors that homosexuals have complete freedom to pursue without it. A marriage license doesn’t give liberty; it gives gov validation and approval.

If Glenn really was against gov being in marriage, then he should be against any kind of gov endorsed marriage. But then, his hypocrisy and inconstancy on the issue is breath taking.

Thursday, April 11, 2013

SEXUAL ORIENTATION

"Sexual orientation" is a highly ambiguous term loaded with hidden false assumptions. So-called 'sexual orientation' is just a theory that lets people pretend that sexuality is a subjective state-of-mind and not an objective truth based on our self-evident physiological reality.

An "orientation" describes the perspective of a subject toward an object. A "sexual orientation" therefore describes a person (subject) by the object toward which they are sexually attracted: a person with same sex attraction is someone oriented toward someone of the same sex, a bisexual toward both sexes, a pedophile toward children, a sado-masochist toward giving or receiving pain, etc.

By definition, there are an unlimited number of potential sexual orientations. The "gay" movement, however, arbitrarily recognizes only four orientations: heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, and transgendered (i.e. transvestites and transsexuals). Why? Because to recognize other orientations - pedophilia, for example - would draw attention to the importance of distinguishing between orientation and conduct, when a major purpose of "sexual orientation" theory is to legitimize and protect homosexual conduct by obscuring this distinction.

This is most clearly seen in anti-discrimination policies that include so-called "sexual orientation." Government and corporate policy makers include "sexual orientation" in anti-discrimination policies in order to protect freedom of thought and speech on the basis of the claim that "sexual orientation" is nothing more than a state of mind.

Americans rightfully cherish the First Amendment right to think and speak freely. The practical effect of such policies, however, is to legitimize and protect any sexual conduct associated with an orientation. For example, under such policies a landlord is expected to rent to homosexuals even if they admit they intend to commit sodomy on the property, and this is his sole reason for wanting to deny their application.

Why is this distinction between orientation and conduct so important? Because sexual conduct has serious public health consequences, which society has both a right and an obligation to regulate. (This is why the people should have a right to vote on same sex "marriage.") In contrast, there are no public health implications to sexual orientation, properly defined. Even a pedophile's "orientation" or desire, abhorrent as it may be, is harmless to the public if he/she never acts upon it.

Policy makers could stop this end run around public health considerations by adding one sentence to existing anti-discrimination laws: "This policy shall not be construed to legitimize or protect any sexual conduct deserving of regulation in the public interest." The right to claim a "sexual orientation" should not automatically grant a license for sexual conduct.

Another purpose of "sexual orientation" theory is to create a context in which homosexuality and heterosexuality hold equal status. The notion of equivalency between homosexuality and heterosexuality is very important to "gay" arguments. For one thing it neutralizes health and safety arguments against the legitimization of homosexuality.

For example, it is an uncontested fact that homosexual conduct spreads disease and dysfunction. When reminded of this, "gay" sympathizers say, "Heterosexuals do the same things." This isn't a logical defense of homosexuality per se, since two wrongs don't make a right, and the medical data shows that heterosexual behavior, even when promiscuous, really doesn't result in nearly as many health consequences. However, it is an argument for treating homosexuality equally with heterosexuality, if the two were truly equivalent. But they are not.

Unlike homosexuality, heterosexuality is immutable. To define heterosexuality as merely sexual conduct between people of compatible genders is to suppress a fundamental truth about what it means to be human. All human beings with the exception of very rare occurrence of hermaphrodites (people with genital deformities) are born with a reproductive system that is heterosexual by nature. We are either male or female. We have sexual feelings only because of chemical and other hormonal processes that are rooted in our procreative heterosexual design. Thus, a male sexual orientation toward a female (or vice versa) is self-evidently normal and natural. By contrast, a male-to-male or female-to- female orientation is self-evidently abnormal and unnatural. For homosexuality to be equivalent to heterosexuality, it would need to be rooted in its own homosexual physiology.

In reality, homosexuality is nothing more than same-gender conduct among people who are innately and unchangeably heterosexual. Homosexuality is thus biologically (and to varying degrees morally) equivalent to pedophilia, sado-masochism, bestiality, and many other forms of deviant behavior, or behavior that deviates from the normal design-based function of the human being.

A second reason for espousing the demise of equivalency is that it allows "gay" activists to exploit the civil rights doctrines, which otherwise would not apply. Discrimination, in the civil rights context, means treating equal parties unequally. If homosexuals and heterosexuals are assumed to be equal, then it is unfair to deny homosexuals all of the benefits that heterosexuals enjoy. "Gay" sophists have coined the term "heterosexism" to describe favoritism towards heterosexuals. To grasp the implications of heterosexism according to their mind-set, simply think of it as "racism" toward homosexuals. Society isn't heterosexist, nature is. And people of faith need to ask themselves if they think GOD is heterosexist. This so-called "heterosexism" is the reason why all of us exist.

An anti-discrimination policy based upon "sexual orientation" is always the first step in the homosexual takeover of an organization, because it locks in pro-"gay" assumptions. From the adoption of this policy, the organization must accept as fact that homosexuality is immutable, equivalent to heterosexuality, and deserving of special protections without regard to public health considerations. Criticism of these positions, or even failure to affirm them, can be considered violations of the policy. Where such a policy is enacted, adoption of the rest of the homosexual political agenda is virtually inevitable. The conclusions are assured by the premises. The takeover process varies slightly depending on the type of organization, but is predictable and easily recognized.

The takeover of local governments begins in the local media (where there is never a shortage of "gay" political activists) with a campaign to raise awareness of discrimination against legitimate minorities. A call then goes out to form a Human Relations Commission to study the problem and develop community-based solutions. The commission is then formed with quasi-governmental authority. The anti-discrimination policy comes next, often without mention of "sexual orientation." That is usually added by amendment later. Opposition is usually minimal, because no one wants to be perceived as being in favor of discrimination. This is not a baseless fear. Pro-"gay" activists in both the media and the government greet any opposition with widely-publicized accusations of racism and bigotry.

Invariably, one duty of the commission is to gather, analyze and report statistics on discrimination in the community. (This is probably where the concept of "hate crimes" originated as a "gay" political strategy).

The use of a reporting plan assures the favorable outcomes for homosexuals. First, they gain a measure of legitimacy merely by being listed together with true civil rights minorities (without having to justify their inclusion among those whose status is based on morally neutral criteria such as skin color and ethnicity). Second, the very nature of the reporting process virtually guarantees an increase of discriminatory incidents from one reporting period to the next as people gradually become aware of the system. This appearance of a growing problem bolsters their demands for additional concessions to their agenda.

The takeover of a corporation begins with the placement of an activist (usually in-the-closet) homosexual into a hiring position. Other undisclosed "gays" are then hired to fill strategic positions in the company. When the ability to control the process is assured, some of the activists come "out-of-the-closet" and form a "Gay and Lesbian Employees Association." That group then introduces an amendment to the company anti-discrimination policy to include "sexual orientation."

Democratically-run organizations (including political parties, labor unions, and even churches) are targeted based upon their vulnerability to takeover by a unified bloc of voting members. Mass infiltration by activists precedes elections, after which time organizational policy (and bylaws) can be controlled by the new activist leaders, who may or may not disclose that they are "homosexual." I have heard it said that this was how the Metropolitan Community Church, an entirely homosexual -controlled "religious denomination" started, beginning with the takeover of the original MCC, which was reportedly a genuine, but struggling Christian church. These so-called "mainstream" Christian denominations have been particularly targeted, not only because many congregations have seen steeply declining membership in recent decades (i.e. fewer new "members" are needed to gain a voting majority), but because these denominations have vast property holdings and endowment funds, which can be used for activist projects.

Every takeover is followed by consolidation of "gay" power within the organization, starting with some form of "sensitivity training." Sensitivity training employs proven psychological coercion tactics (i.e. "brainwashing") to indoctrinate members of the organization in pro-"gay" thinking. By the very nature of the manipulative tactics used, few dare to openly dissent. Those who do are duly noted by the control group. And if they are considered a real threat, they are marginalized and may in time be forced out. Sensitivity training is usually mandatory for all members of the organization.

Once the control group has consolidated power, the organization is plundered for its available resources. These include tangible resources such as money and property, but also intangibles such as advertising and vendor contracts, and even community goodwill. Charitable giving, too, is exploited, as gifts and grants are diverted away from previously-favored beneficiaries like the Boy Scouts or Habitat for Humanity to "gay"-controlled organizations. While some resources benefit the internal control group (i.e. domestic partnership benefits and employee perks), most are focused strategically outside of the organization to further the "gay" political agenda in the community.

All the processes described above are made possible simply by the acceptance of "sexual orientation" as a theory of human sexuality.

In summary, "sexual orientation" is a term that is used by homosexual activists to deceive both policy makers and the public about the nature of homosexuality. It frames the debate about homosexuality in such a way that the average person is tricked into accepting "gay" presuppositions without challenge. This is even true of those people who continue to oppose the homosexuals' political goals. Once the presuppositions have been accepted, especially when they become "law" in anti-discrimination policies, resistance to rest of the homosexual agenda becomes much more difficult.

The only effective strategy is to reject and refute the false assumptions of "sexual orientation" and re-frame the issues on a truthful foundation. "Sexual orientation" must be exposed for what it is: a nonsensical theory about sexuality invented by "gay" political strategists to serve their own selfish interests at the expense of the welfare of society as a whole.

By Scott Lively ...

Side note (my thoughts): The whole "hate" crimes bills thing is fraudulent and actually perpetuates more division and segregation between groups of people. The idea of government using the term "hate" in a legal definition for restricting speech or defining punishment in any way is an extremely flawed idea. "Hate" is also a highly subjective term, which is being used by the so-called "tolerance" crowd (liberals and homosexualists) to advance their own morality and beliefs, under the authority of government and the law. They simply define anything they disagree with to be "hate," but ironically such people often use the term as a projection of their very own hatred of the other person's beliefs and ideals. Not only that, it implies that we have the ability to judge what a person is thinking in his/her heart. But truth is...only GOD can do that.

Sunday, December 9, 2012

PETE KALINER FACEBOOK DEBATE ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE

KR.. Ahhh how heart warming! ... As soon as same-sex marriage was brought into the conversation, both Butler and Pete were holding hands and singing kumbaya ... how touching! You've both found common ground for an aberrant sexual predilection, that trumps the right of conscience. That uses the force of gov to coerce others into validating an unhealthy and harmful sexual behavior. By promoting to our children that this aberrant sexual behavior is a safe and healthy sexual practice to engage in, or experiment with. Well done!! Nothing like consensus. Tuesday at 10:00pm · Like ·1

Blake Butler K. - thanks for calling in to the simulcast yesterday. Kathy I am against Amendment One because it discriminates. And you should look around and realize its 2012...no one is scared of homosexuals and lesbians. Except you of course, judging from the links above. Wednesday at 9:34am · Like · 1

Paula Tahan what a great idea, would love to see it every week . Wednesday at 10:08am · Like


News Radio 570 WWNC ‎[PETE KALINER] Also, look at how many computer monitors I had to use. Blake did it with just one monitor in front of him... and that was a production computer. Very impressive. :) Wednesday at 11:41am · Like · 1


Mr Butler I find it interesting that you chose to ignore the very unhealthy aspects of homosexuality. It's very telling. So tell me, what homosexual sex act do you want your children to be instructed in, in the gov schools? How about fisting, or rimming? http://biggovernment.com/tag/fistgate/ …. Little Black Book. http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/black_book/black_book_inside.html

I don't think teaching an unhealthy aberrant sexual behavior is appropriate for children to be taught in the public schools? Because once governments assert that same-sex relationships are the equivalent of marriage, those governments MUST defend and enforce a whole host of other social changes, and restrictions of freedoms. It's insane!! And I think, a danger to liberty and freedom.

Discrimination?... People discriminate continually. In your misguided and inane progressive moral superiority, you fail to realize that even you discriminate... I do it, you do it, everyone does it. You discriminate against Conservatives and... Conservatives discriminate against Progressives....and on and on. Discrimination concerning behavior, and policy is done everyday. Behavior can be controlled, if one practices self restraint, and respect for others. And to be sure, homosexuality is a behavior. Discrimination is nothing but freedom of choice concerning behavior or policy. Breitbart www.breitbart.com Breitbart Wednesday at 12:34pm · Like · 1 ·


I just have a problem with one group of aberrant sexual behaviorists that are tying to use gov to force me and mine to embrace and validate a very unhealthy and harmful aberrant sexual behavior, through the gov schools and civil and governmental institutions.

Same-sex marriage is not about civil rights. It’s about validation and social respect. It's a radical attempt at civil engineering using government muscle to strong-arm the people into accommodating a lifestyle many find deeply offensive, contrary to nature and socially destructive. Once same-sex marriage becomes law, no one will be able to opt out … it's the LAW! Wednesday at 12:34pm · Like · 1

KR .. This is Pete Kaliner's wall isn't it? So where's Pete? Wednesday at 12:36pm · Like





I debate passionately and with vigor. I'm tired of this political correct nonsense that passes for debate. If one can't stand the heat, then get out of kitchen.

You never explained, because I listened to the podcast again. And if your speaking about getting gov out of marriage, then I've already addressed that argument in my previous post ... No response on that ether?

My argument is solid, as you refuse to refute the points I've made. Because you can't. As you've said before on your show, you're all over those on FB, posting rebuttals to those who espouse policies you don't agree with. But on my arguments, it's ... Cricket, Cricket, Cricket.

I will give no quarter when it comes to the influences on my family and the ever coarsening and degrading of the American culture . By those who deliberately ignore the path this nation on and who confuse license for liberty. Wednesday at 2:29pm · Like · 1


Which brings us to the lessons of the Roman Empire. In the book, The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire, we see that civilizations demise by one of those thousand cuts. Through the rampant decline of a moral society and culture. Homosexuality being one of those aberrant sexual behaviors that hastened the decline.

No, these "so called" lovers of liberty and freedom are short sighted in the extreme ... and myopic ... lacking in discernment and long-range perspectives. To the detriment in the long term of the very liberty, freedom and civilization they proclaim to love.

And you know the old saying? ... "Those who ignore history, are destined to repeat it."

I see that very thing happening to America, because of the Marxist Left, and many of these so called "true conservatives" and Libertarians like John Hood and Vinroot who have drunk the koolaid of the LGBTQ propaganda and embraced moral relativism. Wednesday at 2:45pm · Like · 1





K. you think an effective argument is referring to your personal barometer of "validation" or what you consider "social respect", this issue is about Discrimination....and you just don't get it. We should really move on from this thread Kathy. Good luck operating from a 1927 viewpoint in modern day 2012. I am sure we will meet again. Wednesday at 8:59pm · Like


..Andrew Sullivan,homosexual activist, author, editor, political commentator and blogger, writes ... “Including homosexuals within marriage would be a means of conferring the highest form of social approval imaginable.”

This is the real reason homosexual activists are relentlessly pushing to get the government to endorse same-sex marriage. Most don’t want to get “married,” but they do want the social approval that same-sex marriage will win them.

Maybe the statements and goals of homosexual activists, in their own words will be of interest to you. http://reformpartyofmichigan.homestead.com/files/Do_Homosexuals_Really_Want_The_Right_To_Marry.htm

In Their Own Words: The Homosexual Agenda Along with stats from a survey of 2500 practicing homosexuals in "Out Magazine" http://www.forthechildreninc.com/issues/homosexuality/TheAgenda/InTheirOwnWords.html

What you don't get it is the refusal to acknowledge the very fluid and transitory nature of LGBTQ's sexual behavior. You've drunk the koolaid and propaganda of equating race with a mutable sexual behavior. Which is insulting to many people of color.

No aberrant, and mutable sexual behavior should ever trump the First Amendment and the right of conscience.

Demolishing the idea that 'there's no such thing as an ex gay' http://treesforlunch.blogspot.com/2011/12/demolishing-idea-that-theres-no-such.html

Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays (PFOX) http://pfox.org/about_us.html

Former homosexual Greg Quinlan testifies before the Maryland hearing on same-sex marriage. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II8BPZ-3aIE Do Homosexuals Really Want The Right To Marry reformpartyofmichigan.homestead.com In their own words: Homosexual activists reveal their real agenda. Homosexuals ...See More 22 hours ago · Like ·

News Radio 570 WWNC ‎[PETE KALIN ER] Unable is not the same as unwilling. The juice is not worth the squeeze, Kathy. 15 hours ago · Like

KR ... Wow! The whole thread of the Butler debate is gone from the WWNC FB page, or at least I can't find it ... Now wonder why? Was someone OFFENDED by a different point of view, or opinion? I guess the next thing to do is ban me from posting here and there. Cause whatever you do, don't let people see the other side of the story, or another viewpoint so they can make up their on mind. The way to combat speech one disagrees with is for more and more speech. Guess that doesn't work here.

And my last post on the thread over their was about standing on principle and freedom of speech. And here's a prime example of fearing to hear or see another point of view.

Pete is saying, more or less, that I wasn't worth his time to respond. His exact quote was "the juice wasn't worth the squeeze."

So here is my response, which I would have posted earlier if I wasn't having problems with my DSL.

You know that's very convenient Pete. You know you're on the wrong side of this issue. But I'm sure when one has embraced and propagated the fallacious propaganda of radical homosexual activists, it would be very difficult to turn that around after all this time. Because if you did, whyyy you would might be called a bigot or a hater, or a homophobe Standing on principles of freedom of conscience, freedom of speech and the First Amendment is not popular when it butts up against an aberrant mutable sexual behavior. As is seen on the WWNC FB page. My point is made by the scrubbing of the whole thread. 11 hours ago · Like

KR ... I can respect the humanity of a person without being forced to validate, sanction and endorse their sexual predilections, and behaviors through fore of gov. Through public schools, taxpayer-funded programs like charities and non-profits, workplaces and even faith-based organizations that receive public dollars. It will be a new legal and social norm and the law is going to enforce this new social and legal norm on people.

While I feel compassion for people caught up in this compulsion, and understand their desire for societal acceptance, and stamp of approval. Some compulsive behaviors are unhealthy, and lead to a shortened life span ... and therefore should not be encouraged. Should government endorse a behavior that is harmful to those practicing it, and in a larger context to society? And especially one that is not immutable. Equating the behavior of homosexuality with race is one of the propaganda tools used to deceive the masses. Speak about rights, and equality, like LGBTQs are denied living their life the way they wish. And not about the documented unhealthy sexual practice engaged in. 11 hours ago · Like

News Radio 570 WWNC ‎[PETE KALINER] The thread is still here, Kathy. You just posted on it. 11 hours ago · Unlike · 1

News Radio 570 WWNC ‎[PETE KALINER] The reason that there is no point in debating you on this is because your ideas are rooted in faith. There is nothing to be said to counter faith. It's why it's called faith. It's like debating abortion... you don't change anyone's mind and it just degenerates into name-calling and nastiness. But alienating freedom-loving people because they don't want the force of government to be applied in ANY fashion in marriage, is not a good way to build alliances for other battles where your goals might be the same. 11 hours ago · Like

KR ... A little educational information The 1972 Gay Rights Platform Platform created at the National Coalition of Gay Organizations Convention held in Chicago in 1972 http://www.article8.org/docs/general/platform.htm

After the Ball, by Kirk and Madsen Putting strategies to work: the homosexual propaganda campaign in America's media http://www.article8.org/docs/gay_strategies/after_the_ball.htm

http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexual_Agenda http://www.rslevinson.com/gaylesissues/features/collect/onetime/bl_platform1972.htm Platform article8.org In February 1972 the National Coalition of Gay Organizations met at the Armitag...See More 11 hours ago · Like ·

KR ... Well thank you! Sincerely! Wonder where it's at on the site? 11 hours ago · Like

News Radio 570 WWNC ‎[PETE KALINER] Not sure. The FB timeline thing is pretty bad. Stuff gets moved around beyond our control, and I think each user sees different things on the timelines. Not sure why. 11 hours ago · Like

KR.... Now Pete, have I quoted Scripture? But like I said, it's another convenient stance. My opposition is the peddling of an unhealthy aberrant sexual practice to our children as normal healthy and without harmful effects. That is my opposition. Just as I would oppose the propagation of promiscuity or adultery as a healthy and acceptable behavior held up to kids as a healthy and appropriate sexual behavior. That's what's going on! This fallacious propaganda by radical homosexuals is deceiving and deadly. And I will have none of it!

Getting gov out of marriage is not going to happen anytime soon. And you know it. So we have to work with the situation we're in. And that means not straddling the fence anymore. Either you think this sexual behavior is a healthy, and normal sexual practice that should be promoted to our kids as something healthy and beneficial ... and that some kids might want to experiment with, or you don't.

Guess truth can be alienating and uncomfortable? You know what they say, " The truth will set you free, but it will make you angry first." Sorry if I've made you angry. My goal was enlightenment, though tough love. As I agree with your positions on most other issues. But I've grown tried of pussyfooting around with this PC pablum for fear of offending and alienating. I'm done with that!

This nation is in a war for it's very soul and we have no time to sooth easily hurt feelings because they can't handle the truth.

So go vote against the marriage amendment. you'll be helping to add another cut to the death of a thousand cuts in bringing this nation to it's knees. History has proven that.

Have a good day! 10 hours ago · Like

KR ... I posted earlier on the Pete Kaliner site. Not on the WWNC site. It's very hard to find on the WWNC site. 10 hours ago · Like

News Radio 570 WWNC ‎[PETE KALINER] Kathy, faith is not religion, nor is it scripture. Your faith tells you that certain sexual behaviors are deviant. People who engage in those behaviors, obviously, disagree. You calling them deviants doesn't convince them otherwise. All sexual interactions carry risk, K. Surely you're not suggesting that kissing is deviant behavior, even though it spreads herpes (cold sores).

Also, the idea that my stance is "convenient" is laughable. In case you haven't noticed, I have spents quite a bit of my life now responding to you about the topic. Do you REALLY think it's easy and convenient to have my position as a host on WWNC? lol

But this is why I said.. the juice is not worth the squeeze. You assume I support teaching sex ed in classes. You assume my position necessitates support of a more radical agenda. As I said yesterday - the way to fight the indoctrination efforts is to break the government monopoly on schools. You say I should accept that things are the way they are, and I should focus on gay marriage.

And while you castigate me, you push me away from EVER wanting to agree with you on anything. 10 hours ago · Like

KR ... Never called them deviants ... Look back thorugh the thread, you'll not find the word "deviant" anywhere in my posts ... you're putting words in my mouth ...

Why is it so hard to acknowledge that certain behaviors are harmful, and should not be encouraged. Promiscuity is rampant, (though it's the standard practice of MSM.) And I can give you the medical stats links to prove it. But we know that promiscuous behavior is not healthy or beneficial, and should not be promoted by gov.

As to the kissing ... well, after you know you may contract a disease, or spread a disease by your behavior, what's the local action to take? Should we encourage kids to continue the behavior because it might offend some?

Never said you should accept the way things are ... I said "we" who are in opposition to this issue have to work with what "we" have ... You can show your opposition to gov being involved in marriage by abstaining from voting one way or the other. That's a true protest of the status quo. Cause when you vote one way or the other, you're voting to keep gov involved in marriage.

Never said you should focus on same-sex marriage.

And if your ox is being gored, then it's not me that you should agree with, it's the facts presented to you. Either these medical facts are true or their not. Either this is a healthy and beneficial sexual behavior or it's not.

You ignore what's before your own eyes and become angry at the messenger. Like I said, sorry if I made you upset. Have I inflicted severe punishment on you? Don't think so ... I'm just trying to open people's eyes that have drunk the koolaid of the radical homosexual cabal.

If you hate me for presenting you with information that might upset the paradigm that has so carefully been crafted by radical homosexuals like Kirk and Madsen, Dan Savage and Andrew Sullivan then I regret it. But it doesn't make the information untrue. And if one turns their face away from what is upsetting and refutes the popular narrative, then it's really not me one has a problem with. It's the disturbing facts.

And let me be clear ... I have extended family members that I love greatly who say they are homosexual, but I will not affirm their sexual behavior any more than I would affirm their promiscuity or adultery. And I don't think we should have gov forcing folks to do that. 9 hours ago · Like

News Radio 570 WWNC ‎[PETE KALINER] Angry? Upset? You've illicited no such reaction in me. Also, I've not misquoted you. 8 hours ago · Like

KR ... Did I use the word Deviant ? Don't think so, as I NEVER, EVER use that word. Aberrant means different.

Not angry? Seemed so to me. But that's neither here, nor there ...

So we have peace? Even though you're reluctant to EVER agree with me on anything? Just Ask'n?

But I must inform you, that will not keep me from disagreeing on whatever issue, with anyone ... If I disagree, I will passionately, and with vigor defend my position. I love free, and open and vigorous debate. 6 hours ago · Like

KR ... Guess peace is not in the making. Oh well!

Saturday, April 14, 2012

LINKS OF INTEREST

The Homosexual Age
http://www.bibleprobe.com/homosexuality.htmhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifhttp://www.blogghttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifer.comhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif/img/blank.gif


Top 10 gay marriage false 'facts'
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Perspectives/Default.aspx?id=1122842


After The Ball: Kirk & Madsen
http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
Putting strategies to work: the homosexual propaganda campaign in America's media
http://www.article8.org/docs/gay_strategies/after_the_ball.htm


The 1972 Gay Rights Platformhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
Platform created at the National Coalition of Gay Organizations Convention held in Chicago in 1972
http://www.rslevinson.com/gaylesissues/features/colhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.giflect/onetime/bl_platform1972.htmhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif

Against Same Sex Marriage - The Six Point Case
http://www.allaboutlove.org/against-same-sex-marriage.htm

Do Homosexuals Really Want to Get Married?
http:http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif//reformpartyofmichigan.homestead.com/files/Do_Homosexuals_Really_Want_The_Right_To_Marry.htm



http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
Unmasking the "gay" agenda
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/mbarber/080213


In Their Own Words: The Homosexual Agenda
http://www.forthechildreninc.com/issues/homosexuality
/TheAgenda/InTheirOwnWords.html

http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif



An Argument against Gay Marriage
http://treesforlunch.blogspot.com/2010/06/argument-against-gay-marriage.html

http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
PFOX Highlights Gay Inc.'s Antagonism Towards Former Homosexuals‏
http://treesforlunch.blogspot.com/2012/04/pfox-highlights-gay-incs-antagonism.html


HIV remains a gay disease
http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/09/23/hiv-remains-a-gay-disease/http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif


Demolishing the idea that 'there's no such thing as an ex gay' http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
http://treesforlunch.blogspot.com/2011/12/demolishing-idea-that-theres-no-such.html


VIDEOS ... Homosexual Agenda
http://www.rtbot.net/Homosexual_agenda
http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif

The “Born Gay” Hoax
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/08a/born_gay_hoax/TheBornGayHoax.pdf



How 'gay rights' is being sold to America
David Kupelian on how marketing magic is 'normalizing' sexual perversionhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
http://www.wnd.com/2005/10/32898/


http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
Homosexual Activists Are Popularizing Suicide Among “Gay” Teenshttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
Posted on December 13, 2011 by Alex Mason
http://familypolicy.net/us/?p=10465


Christian couple barred from fostering children because of their views ohttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifn homosexuality go to court
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1325311/Gay-rights-laws-danger-freedoms-Bishops-speak-homosexuality.html


Gay and Lesbians Who Oppose Same-Sex Marriagehttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
http://banap.net/spip.php?article111http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif

http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles/DaileyGayAdopt.php
http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif





HEALTH RISKS



Homosexual Parenting: Placing children at risk
http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles/DaileyGayAdopt.php



Myths, Facts, and Consequences of the Homosexual Lifestyle
http://www.earstohear.net/Separation/facts.html



Health risks of the homosexual lifestyle
http://catholiceducation.org/articles/homosexuality/ho0088.html
http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif


The Physical Health Risks of Homosexuality
http://www.ncfamily.orghttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
/FNC/0707S3.html



The Health Risks of Gay Sexhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
JOHN R. DIGGS, JR., M.D.http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/homosexuality/ho0075.html


Health Risks of the Homosexual Lifestyle
http://factsaboutyouth.com/posts/health-risks-of-the-homosexual-lifestyle/


Issue Analysis
The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=Is01B1

http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
Homosexual Health
http://www.allaboutlove.org/homosexual-health.htm


Health care problems of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1070935/



Higher Risk of Mental Health Problems for Homosexuals
http://psychcentral.com/lib/2011/higher-risk-of-mental-health-problems-for-homosexuals/



Homosexuality and Mental Health Problems
http://psychcentral.com/lib/2011/higher-risk-of-mentahttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifl-health-problems-for-homosexuals/


Homosexuality and Mental Health Problems
http://www.narth.com/docs/whitehead.html
http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif


Higher Risk of Mental Health Problems for Homosexuals
http://psychcentral.com/lib/2011/higher-risk-of-mental-health-problems-for-homosexuals/


The American Journal of Public Health Highlights Risks of Homosexual Practices
http://www.narth.com/docs/risks.html
http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif


Health Risks: Fisting and other Homosexual Practices
http://narth.com/docs/healthrisks.html



http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
Homosexuality: A public health disaster
http://www.wnd.com/2006/01/34534/




In Their Own Words, Promiscuity Quotes by Homosexuals
Homosexual Promiscuityhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
http://www.wpaag.org/Homosexuals%20and%20Same%20Sex%20Marriage.htm



Health concerns for gay men and men who have sex with men
http://brown.edu/Student_Services/Health_Services/Health_Education/lgbtq_health/gay_men_and_msm_health/health_concerns_for_gay_men_and_msm.php
http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif



Homosexuality and health - Conservapedia

http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality_and_health



Comparing the Lifestyles of Homosexual Couples to Married Coupleshttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif

http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=IS04C02



Homosexual men and women
http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1114912/


Homosexuals’ Complaint against Health Canada Lists Negative Health Consequhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifences of Homosexual Lifest
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2009/may/09051403

http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
Statistics on HIV/AIDS and health related issues

http://carm.org/statistics-hiv-aids-health


http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
Male Homosexual Behavior
http://factsaboutyouth.com/posts/male-homosexual-behavior/


U.S. Panel Suggests Research Into Causes and Prevalence of Health Issues Facing Gays

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/01/health/policy/01gays.html
http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif


Study: Homosexual lifestyle strongly linked to depression, suicide

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=255614

http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif


Poor mental health among homosexuals caused by “lifestyle itself” or “discrimination”?
http://www.lifesitenews.com/newshttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif/poor-mental-health-among-homosexuals-caused-by-lifestyle-itself-or-discrimi


The tragic health risks of the homosexual lifestyle

http://savingmarriage2011.blogspot.com/2011/07/tragic-health-risks-http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifof-homosexual.html



Anal sex
http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/sexandrelationships/analsex.htm




Study: HIV-positive Practicing Homosexual Men 9000% More Likely to Develop Ahttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifnal Cancer
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2007/mar/07032205


Healthy People 2020 Gay Men's Health Fact Sheet

http://www.cancer-network.org/media/pdf/HP_2020_gay_men_fact_sheet.pdf



The Top Ten Myths About Homosexuality
http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF10F01.pdf

Thursday, March 29, 2012

HOMOSEXUAL HEALTH RISKS

Persons engaging in homosexual sex are many times more likely than others to acquire a new, highly antibiotic-resistant strain of the so-called MRSA bacteria widely know as the “superbug,” a UCSF-led study shows. January 14, 2008 http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif


(CDC) – HIV among Homosexual, Bisexual and other Men who have sex with Men (MSM) quote: “In 2007, MSM were 44 to 86 times as likely to be diagnosed with HIVhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif compared with other men, and 40 to 77 times as likely as women.” http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm/index.htmhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif



Study: HIV-positive Practicing Homosexual Men 9000% More Likely to Develop Anal Cancer http://www.physiciansforlife.org/content/view/1338/27/http://


"We found that even if gay men behave the same way heterosexuals do -- in terms of sexual partner numbers -- "gay" men would still have a huge HIV epidemic," Dr. Goodreau said. Universities of Washington and New York, Sexually Transmithttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifted Infections Journal, Sept. 13 2010
http://www.drugs.com/news/number-partners-doesn-t-explain-gay-hiv-rate-9307.html





http://www.twoorthree.net/2008/01/gays-incubating.html



CDC Analysis Provides New Look at Disproportionate Impact of HIV and Syphilis Among U.S. Homosexual and Bisexual Men, March 10, 2010
http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/Newsroom/msmpressrelease.htmlhttp://




Chlamydial infections remain common in people choosing Homosexual http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifSexhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
15 February 2009 http://sti.bmj.com/content/early/2009/02/15/sti.2008.035311.abstract



Bacterial Vaginosis has mutated to a STD among women choosing lesbianism
New York Medical Center – National Institute of Health, 1995 Dec 21


Chlamydia trachomatis infection in increasing women who have sex with women
CT growing among homosexual and bisexual women
Allergy and Infectious Diseases, U. of Washington – National Institute of Health
Aug 19, 2010, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20724697
http://www.centerforhealthtraining.org/projects/documents/CT%20WSW.pdf

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// "A lesbian couple in a monogamous relationship each presented with vaginal discharge demonstrable on culture to contain Trichomonas vaginalis" 'Sexually acquired metronidazole-resistant trichomoniasis in a lesbian couple' Directorate of Medicine, Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Trust, UK National Institute of Health, 1996 Feb http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8655171?dopt=Abstract ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// "We demonstrated a higher prevalence of BV, hepatitis C, and HIV risk behaviors in WSW compared with controls." 'Sexually transmitted infections and risk behaviors in women who have sex with women' Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Sydney Hospital, Australia National Institute of Health Sex Transm Infect. 2001 Oct http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11141849?dopt=Abstract ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// "...though most are unaware of their infection, according to a new report. Nearly half the women (46%) were seropositive for HSV-1, the report indicates, and 7.9% were seropositive for HSV-2." 'Herpes Simplex Virus Infections Common Among Lesbians.' Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 02 January 2004 http://www.urotoday.com/component/jentlacontent/herpes-simplex-virus-infections-common-among-lesbians-694.html ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// The sexual behaviors of WSW allow transmission of cervicovaginal secretions and blood-borne pathogens, as supported by reports of several STI among women who reported sex exclusively with women." http://www.benthamscience.com/open/toidj/articles/V003/SI0106TOIDJ/128TOIDJ.pdf ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Chlamydia trachomatis infection in increasing women who have sex with women CT growing among gay and bisexual women. Allergy and Infectious Diseases, U. of Washington - National Institute of, Health, Aug 19, 2010 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20724697 ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Bacterial Vaginosis has mutated to a STD among women choosing lesbianism New York Medical Center - National Institute of Health, 1995 Dec 21 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8749623 //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Link Between Sexual Orientation and Cancer – Cancer Network ********************************************************************************** Rapid Upsurge of Drug-resistant HIV for Gays ********************************************************************************** Gay and bisexual men have the highest rates of the disease, and 90 percent of the cases reported last year involved men who have sex with men.” ********************************************************************************** Same-Sex Couples Detrimental to Society and Especially Children ********************************************************************************** HIV and syphilis rates highest among men choosing gay sex ********************************************************************************** CDC: US Gay and Bi-sexual Men 50 Times More Likely to Get HIV Infection than others *********************************************************************************** Same-Sex ‘Marriage’ a Health Risk Doctors Warn Parliamentarians *********************************************************************************** CDC Analysis Provides New Look at Disproportionate Impact of HIV and Syphilis Among U.S. Gay and Bisexual Men ************************************************************************************* Young Gay Men Fueling Rise in HIV Rates ************************************************************************************** U.S. Panel Upholds Ban on Gay Men as Blood Donors ************************************************************************************* CLICK LINK BELOW FOR MORE & TO READ STUDIES .... http://gayterribletruth.wordpress.com/ //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Lesbians Are More Likely Than U.S. Women Overall to Have Risk Factors for Gynecologic and Breast Cancer: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3318301.html HIV Risk for Lesbians, Bisexuals & Other Women Who Have Sex With Women... http://www.gmhc.org/files/editor/file/GMHC_lap_whitepaper_0609.pdf HIV and syphilis rates highest among persons engaging in homosexual sex HIV: "44 times that of other men" Syphilis: "46 times that of others - 71 times more than women" CDC’s National Center for HIV/AIDS - Infectious Disease News, March 10, 2010 http://www.infectiousdiseasenews.com/article/61780.asp And on, and on, and on...

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

GLENN BECK ON HOMOSEXUALITY

I can respect the humanity of a person without being forced to validate, sanction and endorse their sexual predilections, and behaviors. While I feel compassion for people caught up in this compulsion, and understand their desire for societal acceptance, and stamp of approval. Some compulsive behaviors are unhealthy, and lead to a shortened life span and therefore should not be encouraged. Should government endorse a behavior that is harmful to those practicing it, and in a larger context to society? And especially one that is not immutable. Equating the behavior of homosexuality with race is insulting to a multitude of people of color.

All of media is doing what Daniel Patrick Moynihan called ... "Defining deviancy down.

Moynihan was an intellectual trailblazer. In 1993, he introduced the concept of "Defining deviancy down." In a widely quoted article, he wrote that each generation adjusts to growth in antisocial and secxual behavior by regularly redefining deviancy and, in effect, pretending nothing is getting worse.

As he summarized it in the language of political science: "I proffer the thesis that, over the past generation … the amount of deviant behavior in American society has increased beyond the levels the community can ‘afford to recognize’ and that, accordingly, we have been re-defining deviancy so as to exempt much conduct previously stigmatized, and also quietly raising the ‘normal’ level in categories where behavior is now abnormal by any earlier standard."

It's none of my business what people do in the privacy of their bedroom, but it most certainly is my business when it comes to who influences my kids ... whats done on the public streets, in the public schools, and public institutions ... just who is pushing their sexuality in peoples faces?

I will treat everyone with respect, but being forced to validate an aberrant sexual behavior is another matter. No one should be forced to validate anyone elses aberrant private sexual appetite. There's a reason it's called "PRIVATE LIFE."

Political Correctness will kill us ... ether through extreme, radical toleration, or an inner moral rot that helped bring the Roman Empire down. America is repeating history, with the same results.

Thursday, July 14, 2011

On a Favorable Note ... Former LGBTs

http://pfox.org/Former_Transgender_Tells_His_Story.html http://www.blogger.com/img/http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifhhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifblank.gif


"This surgery is absolutely destructive" -- sad message from former transgender to warn others
What the activists don't tell you . . .
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/govt11/tranny_bill/testimony/walt_heyer.html

http://pfox.org/default.htmlhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif

http://www.joedallas.com/http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif

Former (and recovered) "transgender" testifies against SB48 in California

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sgj9cbglWK4


"FREAK" (1 of 11) Testimony of ex gay demonic drag queen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQVFafhjkE4http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif

Greg Quinlan PFOX Maryland hod
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II8BPZ-3aIE

Former editor of a lesbian magazine speaks about her journey from homosexuality to freedom
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2X8T0cyIdA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBc4fnJ9Huk


And on, and on, and on.